Depot vs Blacksmith: GitHub Actions Runner Comparison
Two popular managed-runner options with different strengths: Depot for Docker builds, Blacksmith for raw CPU speed.
Depot and Blacksmith both beat GitHub-hosted runners, but they optimize for different things. Here is the honest split - plus where a self-healing option like Latchkey comes in.
| Depot | Blacksmith | |
|---|---|---|
| Best at | Docker build acceleration + remote cache | High-clock-speed CPU runners |
| Ideal workload | Container-heavy pipelines | Single-threaded build/test |
| Self-healing | No | No |
Pick Depot if
Your CI is dominated by Docker image builds and remote build caching is your bottleneck.
Pick Blacksmith if
Your build/test time is CPU-bound and faster per-core hardware is the win.
A third option
If your real pain is cost plus flaky re-runs, neither solves that - Latchkey adds self-healing on cheaper managed runners.
The verdict
Docker-bound: Depot. CPU-bound: Blacksmith. Cost + reliability: evaluate Latchkey alongside them.