Skip to content
Latchkey

Depot vs Blacksmith: GitHub Actions Runner Comparison

Two popular managed-runner options with different strengths: Depot for Docker builds, Blacksmith for raw CPU speed.

Depot and Blacksmith both beat GitHub-hosted runners, but they optimize for different things. Here is the honest split - plus where a self-healing option like Latchkey comes in.

DepotBlacksmith
Best atDocker build acceleration + remote cacheHigh-clock-speed CPU runners
Ideal workloadContainer-heavy pipelinesSingle-threaded build/test
Self-healingNoNo

Pick Depot if

Your CI is dominated by Docker image builds and remote build caching is your bottleneck.

Pick Blacksmith if

Your build/test time is CPU-bound and faster per-core hardware is the win.

A third option

If your real pain is cost plus flaky re-runs, neither solves that - Latchkey adds self-healing on cheaper managed runners.

The verdict

Docker-bound: Depot. CPU-bound: Blacksmith. Cost + reliability: evaluate Latchkey alongside them.

Related guides

References

Cut runner spend by up to 70% with Latchkey managed runners and self-healing. Start free → 30-day trial · No credit card